Tuesday, 28 May 2024    HomeAbout UsContact Us     

You are here: Home / Sayyid Qutb
Readings in Elementary Communism: Karl Marx, Freidrich Engels, Sayyid Qutb, Capitalism, the State, Social Justice, Revolution and the Communist Manifesto
Filed under: Sayyid Qutb
Wednesday, January 20 2010 - by Admin
Key topics: Communist Manifesto Socialism Communism Karl Marx Frederick Engels Sayyid Qutb

Bookmark and Share

Mail to a FriendPrinter friendly

Sayyid Qutb and Marxist Communism

Sayyid Qutb, despite an early Islamic upbringing, spent around 15 years or so in uncertainty and confusion, doubting about the very foundations of Islam. In this period he studied and was influenced by the materialist philosophies of the West, and was particularly influenced by Marxist Socialism. He was a member of the secular Hizb ul-Wafd party for a period of time. He maintained a strong relationship with Abbas Mahmud al-Aqqaad, the Egyptian Existentialist, nationalist, writer, philosopher, and was influenced by him until the late 1940s. Refer to the book of Salaah al-Khaalidee (من الميلاد إلى الإستشهاد) "From Birth to Martyrdom" a biography of Qutb (pp. 213-245), in which al-Khalidee recounts this period of great confusion of Sayyid Qutb in his thoughts and ideas before turning to Islam - there are quotes from this book at the end of this article. That Marxist Communist nurturing unfortunately never left him and it continued in the laying down of his "fikr" when he started writing about Islam from the late 1940s onwards. When trying to criticize Capitalism, he had no recourse except to the ideology of Marxist Communism, which comes through his discourses on Islam, Capitalism and "Social Justice" in his books.

Sayyid Qutb: Islam is a Mixture of Communism and Christianity

Below is the inside page of the 13th edition and print of Sayyid Qutb's "Ma'rakat ul-Islam war-Ra'samaaliyyah", published in 1993CE (1414H).

The books of Sayyid Qutb continue to be published under the supervision of his brother Mohammad Qutb who is upon the same "fikr".

Qutb says (p. 61):

And it is necessary for Islaam to judge, since it is a unique, constructive and positivist aqidah which has been moulded and shaped from Christianity and Communism together, [with a] blending in the most perfect of ways and which comprises all of their (i.e Christianity and Communism's) objectives and adds in addition to them harmony, balance and justice.

The words used by Qutb (تصوغ) - forming, shaping, moulding something from something, to forge, fabricate something. And (مزيجا) - compounded, blended, a mixture, medley, blend, combination, compound, alloy - from (مزج) - to mix, mingle, incorporate, blend, i.e. a thing with water, or a thing with something else. And he added to that (كاملا) - complete, perfect. All this from Lane's Lexicon. So we have a complete, perfect, mix and blend of each of Communism and Christianity into a medley, compound and alloy, to make up Islam.

Therefore Qutb has stated that Islam is a mixture and blend, a mingling of those ideologies of men and shares in their ideals and goals, and that it simply adds the elements of harmony, balance and justice to a combination of those man-made religions and secular systems.

With these kinds of statements it should come as no surprise that Sayyid Qutb should incorporate some of these Marxist Communist ideals or doctrines into his "fikr", when he started writing about Islam without knowledge.

Marx and Engels on the Nature of Capital and Private Ownership

The greatest foundation laid down by Communism is the confiscation of private property and wealth by the state and its redistribution (according to the state's designs) upon the principle that the fruits of all private endeavor actually belong to the whole society. This being in the name of preventing "exploitation and abuse" through "private capital and wealth". Thus capital is presented as being "common property". This perception of capital (wealth) is the foundation upon which communist social policies are built.

Marx and Engels wrote, laying down the foundations, in their 1848 paper "The Communist Manifesto" (p. 14):

Capital is therefore not only personal; it is a social power. When, therefore, capital is converted into common property, into the property of all members of society, personal property is not thereby transformed into social property. It is only the social character of the property that is changed. It loses its class character.

The Communist Manifesto argues for the abolition of private property and for the right of the state to take and redistribute wealth as it sees fit. Qutb, after acknowledging the right to individual ownership, allows the state the same power afforded in the Marxist Communist ideology, above and beyond that afforded by the Sharaa'i (legislative commands) of Islaam (meaning Zakah). Qutb goes further, and also permits the state to impose taxes that it sees fit to impose - not unlike the progressive income taxes that are also found in "the Communist Manifesto" as part of their solution to combat the so-called "tyranny" of "capital" (i.e. private ownership).

Marxist Socialism in Qutb's Book "Social Justice"

In the book "al-Adaalah al-Ijtimaa'iyyah", "Social Justice in Islam", Qutb espouses the same communist credo wherein he discusses the true nature of private property (wealth). Qutb attempted to critique Capitalism with his Marxist Socialist background, and in that process he tried to impose a communist understanding and framework upon Islam - that explains his statement above of Islam being made up, in part, of Communism.

It is in this same book (amongst others) that Qutb's scorn, revilement and attacks upon Uthmaan (radiallaahu anhu) and Mu'awiyah (radiallaahu anhum) and the Bani Umayyah are found, and his attacks upon them are from the angle that they departed from the envisaged "Social Justice" Qutb was writing about and in whose formulation, he received a helping hand from the manifestos of secular atheist Jews regarding what denotes Social Justice. And it is through these scales of justice that he finds fault with those Companions, accusing them of departing from the "spirit of Islam".

Qutb writes in "Social Justice" (p. 91, Dar ash-Shurooq, 1995CE):

وأول مبدأ يقرره الإسلام بجوار حق الملكية الفردية: (1) أن الفرد أشبه شيء بالوكيل في هذا المال عن الجماعة. (2) وأن حيازته له إنما هي وظيفة أكثر منها امتلاكاً. (3) وأن المال في عمومه إنما هو أصلاً حق الجماعة. (4) والجماعة مستخلفة فيه عن الله الذي لامالك لشيء سواه. (5) والملكية الفردية تنشأ عن بذل الفرد جُهداً خاصاً لحيازة شيء معين من هذه الملكية العامة التي استخلف الله فيها جنس الإنسان

The first (elementary) principle that Islam affirms alongside private (individual) ownership is: (1) That the individual most closely resembles a trustee of this wealth on behalf of the group (society). (2) That his possession of it is simply a functional duty more than it is one of (actual) ownership. (3) That wealth in general is fundamentally the right of the group (society). (4) The group (society) is the one that is left as a successor over the wealth on behalf of Allaah besides whom there is no other Master (Owner). (5) [The notion of] individual ownership emanates from the individual's specific striving to possess something specific from this general property (wealth etc.) in which Allaah has made mankind as a species to be its successor.

It is true that all wealth belongs to Allaah in reality, and that a person is simply a trustee over his own wealth for the period that Allaah decrees it remains with him, however Qutb has inserted here the Marxist Communist notion that private wealth earned and owned by an individual is fundamentally the property of the society as a whole, and that the real ownership (after Allaah) belongs to that of the society. And it is in this manner we see that Qutb "fuses" and "mixes" secular atheistic ideals, maxims and principles that he was nurtured upon for two decades of his life, with Islam, and it is no surprise that he sees Islam as a concoction and fusion of the goals and objectives of "Communism" and Christianity.

Qutb also writes in "Social Justice" (p. 94, Dar ash-Shurooq, 1995CE):

فخلاصة الحقيقة عن طبيعة الملكية الفردية في الإسلام (1) أن الأصل هو أن المال للجماعة في عمومها. (2) وأن الملكية الفردية وظيفة ذات شروط وقيود. (3) وأن بعض المال شائع لا حق لأحد في امتلاكه، ينتفع به الجميع على وجه المشاركة. (4) وأن جزءاً منه كذلك حق يرد إلى الجماعة لترده على فئات معينة فيها، وهي في حاجة إليه لصلاح حالها وحال الجماعة معها

The essence of the reality regarding the nature of private (individual) ownership (of wealth, property) in Islam is that 1) The foundational principle is that the wealth belongs to the group (society) in its generality 2) that [the holding of] private property is simply a functional duty which has conditions and restrictions 3) That some wealth is common and no one has any right to possess it, and everyone ought to be benefit from it communally, 4) And a portion of it likewise, is a right that is to be returned to the group (society) so that it (the society) can give it to specific factions within it, which are in need of it to rectify their condition and the condition of the society (in turn) along with it.

The fourth point mentioned above is essentially "zakah" (obligatory charity), however Qutb has gone beyond that by presenting it within the context of the broad communist socialist doctrine he has outlined in the first three points, and he has presented what is "zakah" within the context of that communist doctrine, which is that private wealth and private ownership (of capital) actually belong to the society and to the state, which may if it wishes, confiscate this wealth for redistribution.

These ideas that Qutb is presenting with an Islamic flavor, are nothing but the arguments of the Communists for embezzling the wealth and capital of people, all in the name of Social Justice and equality.

An Illustration of Qutb's Ignorance

In this same book ("Social Justice in Islam") on pages 91-92, Qutb, after outlining the Marxist Socialist principle of individual ownership (wealth) being the right of the community as a whole, Qutb writes:

And I do not affirm this principle in order to affirm Communism of capital (wealth) - for the right of individual ownership is a clear fundamental right in the Islam law (nidhaam) - however I affirm it because of what it contains of a subtle beneficial meaning in developing a true conception of the nature of individual ownersip, and its resctriction with this general principle in the view of Islam towards wealth, and its complete difference to the Capitalist theory of individual ownership.

And here Qutb is saying, "I do not affirm this principle", meaning that private property and individual ownership is in its foundations, the right of the jamaa'ah (group, society) "in order to affirm the Communism of capital (wealth)" - and that's a contradiction, and its like an Ash'ari saying, "I am not saying that this Qur'an we have with us is created..." which is what the Ash'arites hold, that the Qur'an we have, in letter and word, is created, "...in order to affirm Allaah's kalaam is created...". Meaning that the Ash'ari denies he holds Allaah's "kalaam" (speech) to be created, and then in the next sentence he affirms the fundamental doctrine of those (Jahmiyyah, Mu'tazilah) who hold Allaah's "kalaam" is something He creates, through their belief that the Qur'an is created.

And this is what Qutb is doing here, and this is the way of the "thinkers" who tried to write about Islam without knowledge and understanding, and fell into such confusion and contradiction.

The core principles of Marxist Communist Socialism, is that the true nature of property and capital (held by private individuals) is, in its foundation, the right of the society, and the state has the power and ability to confiscate that wealth if it wishes, and the power to legislate laws for the confiscation of that wealth (which would include taxes) for whatever purposes the state sees fit (to actualize "Social Justice"), and for it to confiscate idle wealth that people are sitting on, for redistribution and that in a nutshell is "the Communist Manifesto" of Marx and Engels.

This is the blend and mix that Qutb speaks of in the quote from him at the beginning of this article, the blend and mix between Communism's objectives and Islam, into which Islam brings "harmony".

Qutb continues:

And with even clearer language: I affirm that the perception of the individual that he is simply responsible for this wealth which is in his possession and which is, in its foundation, the property of the jamaa'ah (group, society), will make him accept the obligations which the law place upon him (as his responsibility), and the restrictions through which they define his expenditure (of that wealth).

Meaning, (in Communist speak) that when a person is brainwashed with these Marxist Communist principles, that the state ("representing the society") has a right over his wealth for the "social justice of all", he will readily accept what amounts to the "theft" of his private property, and consider that as part of Social Justice. And thus, the state can make taqneen (legislate qawaaneen) for the theft of that property.

Qutb continues:

Just as the perception of the jamaa'ah (society) of its deep-rooted right to this capital (wealth) will make it more bold, daring in imposing obligations and laying down limits - without exceeding the principles of the Islamic law (nidhaam) which we have indicated ... and through these qawaa'id (principles) it will lead to the actualization of Social Justice completely through (bringing about) benefit through this wealth.

You have to really understand the significance of what Qutb is saying here. After re-affirming for the second time and with emphasis, the Marxist Communist Secular maxim and principle that privately held wealth actually belongs to the society as a whole, and that this is a deep-rooted foundation, he then says that the society (represented in the "state") has the power and right to legislate new laws to impose obligations (such as taxes, see below) and restrictions, through which "Social Justice" can be established.

This is a revilement upon Islam, as if the pillar of zakah and sadaqah and the very clearly laid out monetary obligations laid out in the Sharee'ah are in need of additional Qawaaneen (laws, statutes) to help "actualize social justice". But this is what Qutb is actually saying, and you wonder in amazement at the Qutbiyyah who defend this individual who was nothing but a sentimental and ignorant writer in whose mind all the materialist western philosophies distilled for twenty years, after which he became interested in Islam and started writing, without knowledge or baseerah, and he brought great, great calamities, including the greatest of innovations, those of the Jahmiyyah, Mu'tazilah, Ash'ariyyah,Jabariyyah and others, and claimed Islam was a mixture and concoction of Communism and Christianity and simply added "harmony" to the mix.

In short, Qutb permits the legislation of Secular Laws, above, over and beyond what is in the Sharee'ah in order to help actualize "Social Justice" - so long as those laws don't "exceed the principles of Islamic law" - and these laws he is talking about are those following on from the Communist maxim of "wealth is the common property of all members of the society". Meaning, we can legislate secular laws to help fulfill the objectives of Communism that are nothing but attempts to confiscate (steal) the wealth owned by private individuals - all disguised as and given the title of "Social Justice".

Sayyid Qutb and Confiscation of Private Property and Wealth by the State

The books Qutb wrote, "The Battle of Islam and Capitalism" and "Social Justice in Islam" were written from a Communist perspective against "Capitalism", and Qutb, having little knowledge of the religion, tried to frame that Marxist Communist critique of Capitalism, upon Islam and present Islam as having Communist ideals and objectives. In the book "The Battle of Islam and Capitalism" (pictured above), 13th edition, 1993CE (p. 44), Qutb writes:

بل في يد الدولة أن تنزع الملكيات والثروات جميعاً، وتعيد توزيعها على أساس جديد، ولو كانت هذه الملكيات قد قامت على الأسس التي يعترف بها الإسلام، ونمت بالوسائل التي يبررها؛ لأن دفع الضر عن المجتمع كله أو اتقاء الأضرار المتوقعة لهذا المجتمع أولى بالرعاية من حقوق الأفراد

Rather, it is in the power of the state to confiscate all (private) possessions and fortunes (i.e. personal wealth) and to redistribute them upon a new basis, even if these possessions had been attained (by their owners) through foundations that Islam acknowledges, and had grown (in value, quantity) by means that it (Islam) justifies. Because the repulsion of harm from all of the society or protection of expected harms to this society is more befitting to be given consideration than the rights of individuals.

The Scholars of Islam only allow the requesting of the excess wealth of the rich where that is necessary for jihad in the path of Allaah, should wealth not be available in the Bayt ul-Mal. Other than this, the only duty upon the people is the giving of zakah on wealth they have possessed for one lunar year, if it reaches a certain amount. However, Qutb has gone way beyond the Sharee'ah and has espoused the quintessence of the Marxist Communist justification for confiscating the wealth of the people, and actually allows the state to legislate laws to facilitate that.

Qutb and the Usurping and Theft of the Wealth of Those Who Do Nothing With It

Qutb wrote in "The Battle of Islam and Capitalism" (p. 52)

والإسلام عدو التبطل الناشئ عن تكدس الثراء، فلا جزاء إلا على الجهد ولا أجر إلا على العمل ، فأما القاعدون الذين لا يعملون ، فثراؤهم حرام وأموالهم حرام، وعلى الدولة أن تنتفع بذلك الثراء لحساب المجتمع ، ولا تدعه لذلك المتبطل الكسلان

And Islam is the enemy of inactivity due to the accumulation of riches. There is no reward except for striving and there is no reward except for action. As for those who sit and do not work, then their riches are haraam and their wealth is haraam, and it is upon the state to benefit from those riches for the advantage of the society, and not to leave it for those inactive lazy (ones).

Qutb has made "tahreem" of the wealth of those who do not do anything with that wealth. And this is making haraam what Allaah did not make haraam and it is legislating into the deen of Allaah, that which is not from it, for the only thing upon the rich is to give the zakaah, and to fulfil the monetary obligations as regards to their families and dependants. But this is the influence of that Marxist Socialist nurturing of Qutb, and this Tabdeel of the Sharee'ah and this tahreem (on behalf of Qutb) is printed, distributed and read the world over, due to a people propagandizing for Qutb and his fikr and his books.

Qutb Permits the Legislation of Specific and Numerous Taxes Upon the People

Marx and Engels proposed an income tax as means of preventing and limiting the accumulation of "capital" in the hands of individuals. They write on page 21 of the "the Communist Manifesto", as part of the numerous measures they see appropriate in all countries, to help establish "Social Justice":

A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

This income tax is to be used for the redistribution of wealth in a manner that the state sees fit. Qutb permits the legislation and imposition of a variety of specific taxes, in fact he actually calls the zakah a "tax". Qutb says in "The Battle of Islam and Capitalism" (p. 43):

في يد الدولة أن تفرض أولا ضرائب خاصة غير الضرائب العامة - كما تشاء -، فتخصص ضريبة للجيش ، وضريبة للتعليم ، وضريبة للمستشفيات ، وضريبة للضمان الاجتماعي . . . ، وضريبة لكل وجه طارىء من أوجه الإنفاق لم يحسب حسابه في المصروفات العامة أو تعجز الميزانية العادية عن الإنفاق عليه عند الاقتضاء

It is in the power of the state, firstly, to impose (make binding) specific taxes besides the general taxes - as it wills - thus it stipulates a tax for the army, and tax for education, a tax for hospitals, a tax for collective security ... and a tax for every arising (unforeseen) aspect from the aspects of spending for which it had not budgeted in it's general expenditures, or for which the general (main) budget is unable to spend upon at the time of need.

As we saw earlier, Qutb considers Islam a fusion of Communism and Christianity and as something that adds harmony to the goals and objectives found in them. Here Qutb is permitting the legislating of Secular Laws to help fulfil those Marxist Communist "goals and objectives" and this must be part of the "harmony, balance and justice" (according to Qutb) that Islam brings into the mix.

The imposition of mukoos (sales taxes, levies) are haraam in Islam and are considered dhulm (oppression) and it is a major sin. Imaam adh-Dhahabi includes this in his book "al-Kabaa'ir" (The Major Sins), and Ibn al-Qayyim mentions in "Ahkaam Ahl idh-Dhimmah" (1/149-150), in the course of refuting those who try to analogize for these mukoos (taxes) with an action of Umar bin al-Khattaab in relation to the Ahl ud-Dhimmah:

بعد أن نذكر مقدمة في المكوس وتحريمها والتغليظ في أمرها وتحريم الجنة على صاحبها، وأمر رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم بقتله

...after we mention an introduction on sales taxes, their unlawfulness, and the severity (shown) towards them, the unlawfulness of entering Paradise for the one imposing them, and the command of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) for his killing...

What Qutb is advocating is worse than the mukoos (sales taxes) that are mentioned by the Scholars, and Qutb is legislating these into the religion and making the legislation of these Qawaaneen from the right of the "Muslim" state. We have already seen that he permits the confiscation (stealing) of the wealth of private individuals and through which the state can establish "Social Justice" - as if the Sharee'ah in its own right and merit, does not establish Social Justice.

Qutb Advocates the Marxist-Leninist Revolution to "Snatch and Restore" the Haakimiyyah of Allaah So That this New "Islamic State" Can Establish "Social Justice"

Qutb saw the absence of Social Justice, (and the abuse of capital) as factors that justify revolution, and as we will see further below, Qutb praised the revolution against Uthmaan bin Affaan (radiallaahu anhu) for these very same, specific reasons, claiming it was in accordance with the "Islamic spirit" and that those souls that were stirred in this revolution showed rejection and eschewed evil in what they did and that they were motivated by the "Islamic spirit". It is also for this reason that Qutb poured scorn upon Uthmaan, Mu'awiyah (radiallaahu anhum) and the Bani Umayyah.

Further, having outlined Marxist Socialism in his works and explained that Islam is a mix and blend of Communism, Christianity and their objectives, Qutb also outlined the Marxist-Leninist revolutionary manifesto. This is not a hidden matter and it is acknowledged by all people possessing sound intellect and the rudimentary elements of academic honesty.

Yusuf al-Qaradawi, said in his book (أولويات الحركة الإسلامية) "Priorities of the Islamic Movement" (p.110):

في هذه المرحلة ظهرت كتب الشهيد سيد قطب، التي تمثل المرحلة الأخيرة من تفكيره، والتي تنضح بتكفير المجتمع، وتأجيل الدعوة إلى النظام الإسلامي بفكرة تجديد الفقه وتطويره، وإحياء الاجتهاد، وتدعو إلى العزلة الشعورية عن المجتمع، وقطع العلاقة مع الآخرين، وإعلان الجهاد الهجومي على الناس كافة، والإزراء بدعاة التسامح والمرونة، ورميهم بالسذاجة والهزيمة النفسية أمام الحضارة الغربية، ويتجلى ذلك أوضح ما يكون في تفسير "في ظلال القرآن" في طبعته الثانية، وفي "معالم في الطريق"، ومعظمه مقتبس من الظلال، وفي "الإسلام ومشكلات الحضارة"، وغيرها

And it was in this period that the books of the Shaheed, Sayyid Qutb appeared, the books that represented his final thoughts (in ideology, before his death). Those which justified the Takfir of (whole) societies... the breaking of all sentimental attachments to society, breaking off ties with others, and the announcement of a destructive jihad against the whole of mankind. And showing contempt against the dużat who call for lenience and softness, accusing them of idiocy, and being defeatist [Saying all of this], in front of the western civilisation. He made this manifest, in the most clear manner in the tafsir, "Fee Zilaal il-Qur'aan", in the 2nd edition and in "Ma'alim fit-Tariq" (Milestones), and the bulk of it is taken from "Zilal" and "Al-Islam wa Mushkilat al-Hadaarah" and others...

In the compilation, "Islam and the West, Critical Perspectives on Modernity" (compiled by Michael Thompson), Omer Caha writes (pp. 44-45), and leaving aside some of the unsubstantiated "Nazi" claims, this is an amazingly insightful analysis and an extremely accurate record of what was taking place with these 20th century Islamic "thinkers":

Radical and revolutionary Islam, which emerged as reactions to colonialism, were inspired more by socialist values than by liberal democratic values, and they formulated their principles in line with this outlook. It was common in the Islamic world until the 1980s to consider Islam as a source of ideology as well as a Revolutionary Ideology. It was particularly the Iranian Revolution, which became and inspirational reference for Islamic movements at that time. In this period, Islam was taken by Muslim thinkers of Iranian origin as well as by those of North African origin, almost as a kind of state religion, a Revolutionary Ideology, and a theocratic political structure.

Such interpretations of Islam can be traced back, in the case of some North African countries, to the period between the second half of the nineteenth century and up to the first half of the twentieth century. At that point in time, Muslim countries began to suffer a long period of painful setback in the face of the incredible economic growth and development western countries were experiencing. Moreover, the colonial ambitions of western countries directly over Islamic territories evoked strong reactions from Muslim thinkers of North Africa who began to think in terms of Leninism. This explains a great deal about the distance, which Muslims began to feel toward liberalism, democracy, capitalism,and other similar systems and ideas.

The two key concepts these thinkers borrowed from Leninism were the "state" and "revolution". It was in their view, the state that symolized Social Justice, social unity, and the struggle against the West. Such a state could only be established through revolution, this being under the leadership of a pioneering group.

The works of Sayyid Qutb, an Egyptian Islamic intellectual who was hanged by the Nasser regime in 1966, for instance, emphasize the role of a revolutionary group. Largely on account of his Leninist background, Qutb envisaged the establishment of an Islamic state by means of a revolution led by a specially trained group versed in Islamic values. The project towards the creation of such a group, indeed, can be seen as an attempt to replace Lenin's proletariat vanguards with their Muslim counterparts. For Qutb, the salvation of Muslims, as well as the entirety of humanity depended on an Islamic state that would represent a third way, i.e., an alternative to Socialism and capitalism.

Although critical of Socialism, many Islamic intellectuals, as in the case of Sayyid Qutb, operated on values that might be combined with a Leninist style of state Socialism in some form through its emphasis on collective brotherhood, revolution, equality, salvation, a centralized state, anticapitalism, and antidemocracy amongst others.

Hence, both authoritarian regimes and Muslim intellectuals with a first-hand experience of colonial domination completely refused the West, and sought to set up alternative institutions, which were authoritarian in character. When realizing the traditional interpretations of Islam fell short of enabling the deployment of adequate means by which to resolve existing problems, they began to borrow concepts and perspectives from Russian socialism, which was anticapitalist and antiliberalist in character...

Thought the writer is writing from the perspective of explaining the lack of democracy, or opposition to democracy in the Muslim lands, his analysis of the origins of ideologies based upon the notions of "state" and "revolution" and borrowed from Russian Bolshevism are extremely accurate. This can be seen in the likes of Abu A'la Mawdudi and very clearly in the writings of Sayyid Qutb.

Phil Paine, a writer and independent scholar as he describes himself observes, after reading Milestones for the first time:

... The first thing one notices about Qutb's ideological thought is how little it has to do with traditions of Islam, or the needs of people in Islamic countries. It is profoundly European in inspiration, and it's chief models are Hitler, Marx and Lenin ... Lenin is by far the strongest influence.

Whole passages look like they were simply copied out from his works and then a pseudo-Islamic terminology inserted, "revolutionary vanguard" becoming "Islamic vanguard", and so on... As Marxist mumbo-jumbo justified the telling of any lie, the betrayal of any value, the commitment of any atrocity, in the name of an implacable destiny, so too, does Milestones...

... Qutb was by no means alone. In the 1920's and 1930's, the Muslim Brotherhood and other precursers of today's jihadist movement were profoundly influenced by Marxism and Nazism. Before WWII, Hitler was the greater influence, but with his defeat, Communism became the principal inspiration. In fact, Qutb himself was a delegate to the Communist International, its principle liaison with the Muslim Brotherhood. [R. R. Reilly, "The Roots of Islamist Ideology"]

... Qutb draws on the Asharite tradition, as well as on his Marxist and Nazi sources. But today's totalitarian Islamism is not an attempt to restore the glories of early Islam. Far from it --- it draws its inspiration from the deviations from classical Islam that destroyed those glories...

It is very interesting to see how individuals that are learned, well-read and well-versed can immediately recognize - after reading just a single book (Milestones) - the true and real origins of Qutb's ideology. The writer also had the knowledge and understanding to recognize Qutb's Asharite leanings. So much for those ignoramus journalists and half-boiled writers linking Qutb to Salafiyyah. As for "Marxist" sources, then Qutb was formerly a communist and some of his communist ideology comes through still in his writings such as advocating the confiscation and redistribution of wealth (that will be dealt with in a separate article). As for "Nazi" sources, then we do not know of any credible evidence at this point in time to suggest he had "Nazi" sources for his ideologies.

Ladan and Roya Boroumand wrote in an article titled "Terror, Islam and Democracy", Journal of Democracy 13.2 (2002) 5-20:

Like Mawdudi and various Western totalitarians, he [Qutb] identified his own society (in his case, contemporary Muslim polities) as among the enemies that a virtuous, ideologically self-conscious, vanguard minority would have to fight by any means necessary, including violent revolution, so that a new and perfectly just society might arise. His ideal society was a classless one where the "selfish individual" of liberal democracies would be banished and the "exploitation of man by man" would be abolished. God alone would govern it through the implementation of Islamic law (shari'a). This was Leninism in Islamist dress.

Contemporary members of the Muslim Brotherhood acknowledge that Qutb was influenced by Leninist revolutionary methodology. Ibrahim al-Houdaiby writes in an article "Four Decades After Sayyid Qutb's Execution" (bold emphasis is ours):

In "Milestones" Qutb presents a manifesto for change, one heavily influenced by Lenin's "What is to be done," with the clear Islamization of its basic notions. He argued that society was suffering from "jahiliyya" (a state of ignorance which preceded the revelation of Islam) and that consequently, there is no room for middle ground between Islamists and their societies.

Paul Berman writes in an article published in the New York Times, 23rd March 2003:

The few had to gather themselves together into what Qutb in "Milestones" called a vanguard - a term that he must have borrowed from Lenin ...

In "Sayyid Qutb: The Father of Al-Qaida", published in the Independent in August 2006, Daniel Martin quotes from Lawrence Wright observing about the book "Milestones":

...Its ringing apocalyptic tone may be compared with Rousseau's Social Contract and Lenin's What Is to Be Done? - with similar bloody consequences.

Rod Dreher writes in the Dallas Morning News (27th August 2006):

What is to be done? Lenin famously asked about Czarist Russia. Qutb's answer to the same question about the West was, in part, "Milestones," a Leninist-style tract advocating worldwide Islamic revolution.

As we have noted in a previous article that:

The esteemed scholar, Rabee' bin Haadee al-Madkhalee, who has authored numerous works in refutation of the heresies and Extremism of the father of all modern takfiri groups, pointed out in 1995 Qutb's exposition of elements of Communist ideology as well as his Leninist revolutionary activities.

Shaikh Rabee' stated in "al-Awaasim Mimmaa Fee Kutub Sayyid Qutb Min al-Qawaasim" (p.38, 1st print, 1995):

Secondly: This tashree (legislation) that Sayyid Qutb ascribes to Islaam (referring here to some aspects of socialism-marxism related to confiscation of wealth from the rich for redistribution amongst the poor that Qutb permitted), he borrowed them from the Communist and Western principles (mabaadi) and theorems (nadhariyyaat) which had become widespread in his lifetime. In fact he himself used to imbibe (such principles and theorems) and they remained settled in his soul and in his intellect at the time when he would write in the name of Islaam. Especially when he mounted the peak of the Nasserite Taaghootee Revolution which in its application, centered around Socialism, based upon the theorem of Sayyid Qutb and his likes, those who had mixed Marxist Socialism with the garment of Islaam, and by which Islaam and the Muslims were pounded.

And in the footnote, the Shaikh adds to this:

And the Free Officers, at the head of them, Jamaal Abd an-Nasser, used to be students, learning from the books of Sayyid Qutb, and he (Qutb) used to partner with them in plotting the revolution. Refer to the book "Sayyid Qutb min al-Meelaad Ilaa Istish.haad" (p.299-304) and before these pages, and also the book "Sayyid Qutb al-Adeeb an-Naaqid" (p.105-107)."

Sayyid Qutb based his ideologies on his own Socialist, Marxist, Leninist background. He had already been involved in one Leninist-style revolution when he along with Nasser and the Free Officers plotted the revolution by which Nasser came into power - though he and Nasser later fell out.

The fact that Sayyid Qutb was heavily influenced by Marxist Socialism and Leninism is being firmly established as more and more academic studies are conducted looking at the evolution of Qutb's writings and ideologies in the background of the changing social, economical and political landscapes in the time that Qutb lived (early to mid 20th century).

As all contemporary takfiri and jihadi groups who promote revolution as a means of reform have inevitably taken their methodologies from Sayyid Qutb, they can rightly be called Leninist-Kharijites, as the true intellectual basis of their ideologies and methodologies has been thoroughly exposed. Leninism. Qutb could not find the revolution he envisaged in the Qur'an, or the Sunnah or from any of the Orthodox Muslim scholars.

In fact the above author has shrewdly pointed this out:

When realizing the traditional interpretations of Islam fell short of enabling the deployment of adequate means by which to resolve existing problems, they began to borrow concepts and perspectives from Russian Socialism...

So he took it from Lenin, and then tried to quote from historical and prominent scholars such as Ibn Taymiyyah to argue for aspects of his methodology. As we will show in future articles, Qutb's use of Ibn Taymiyyah to argue for his Leninist methodology is false.

Qutb Attacked Uthmaan, Mu'awiyah (radiallaahu anhum) and Bani Umayyah From the Angle of the [Marxist Communist Ideals] of Social Justice and He Praised the Revolution Against Uthmaan (radiallaah anhu)

We have covered this in another article in more detail (see here), and we can reproduce some of that here: In the book "al-Adaalah al-Ijtimaa'iyyah" (1415H, Dar ash-Shurooq) Qutb writes (p. 160-161):

And towards the end, tumult was stirred up against Uthmaan, and in which truth became mixed with falsehood, and good with evil. However, it is vital for the one who looks at the affairs through the eye of Islaam, and perceives the affairs through the spirit of Islaam that he affirms that that revolution, in its generality, was an outburst of the spirit of Islaam, and this is without ignoring the plot of Ibn Saba' - upon him be the curse of Allaah - that was behind it.

Here, Qutb describes the revolution that Ibn Saba' al-Yahudi instigated, ideologically and practically, against Uthmaan, as something that was a manifestation of the real and true spirit of Islaam - which is that spirit fused with Marxist Communist notions of "Social Justice" with a (مزيجا كاملا), and the spectacles of which Qutb is looking through towards the Companions when he speaks about them - and Qutb described it as such whilst making full admission that it was a revolution instigated by Ibn Saba'. So while he avers the fact that it was plotted by Ibn Saba' he actually agrees with it and is content with it, and considers it in line with the "Communist Islamic" spirit (of "Social Justice") - whilst bearing in mind that Qutb considers Islam to be blended in part from Communism, with a complete and perfect blend, and simply adds harmony to the objectives of Communism!

And he also says a little later (p. 161)

Uthmaan passed to the mercy of his Lord, and he left the Amawi State in power, by virtue of [his] placing them [in authority] upon the land, and particularly in Shaam, and by virtue of what he had put in place of the Amawi foundations that were alien to the spirit of Islam, of establishing hereditary kingship, and monopolization of maghaanim (war-booties), wealth and other utilities, from those things that brought about a convulsion in the general Islamic spirit.

And what was spread in the soul (i.e. collectively) of the subjects was no small matter - whether true or false - that the Khalifah was giving preference to his family (relations), and would donate hundreds of thousands to them, and would remove the Companions of Allaah's Messenger so that he can put the enemies of Allaah's Messenger in place, and keep the likes of Abu Dharr far away (from authority) because he rejected the hoarding of wealth, and rejected the opulence (luxury) that the rich were steeped in, and called to the likes of what the Messenger (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) call to of spending, righteousness and modesty.

And the natural result of the spread of the likes of these ideas - whether true or false - is that the souls would be agitated and that the souls would make presumptions, and that those people whose souls have drunk [from] the spirit of the religion [in terms] of showing rejection and eschewing evil would be stirred, and [likewise] that those souls that [simply] wore the gown of Islaam without it (Islaam) in all its purity, having mixed with their hearts, would also make presumptions, those who are swept away by the desires of the world, and who saw that they should go with the flow [in taking the path] of decadence - and all of this took place in the final part of the era of Uthmaan.

And when Alee came along - may Allaah ennoble his face - it was not easy to return the affair back to its origin in its clemency. And those beneficiaries in the time of Uthmaan, and specifically Bani Umayyah, knew that Alee would not remain silent upon them, and so they withdrew with their disposition and their expediences towards Mu'aawiyah.

You can see here Qutb's choice of words which contain nothing but a continued belittlement of Uthman, Mu'awiyah, Bani Umayyah and glorification of those souls who were stirred by what they saw and were led to revolt, with his full knowledge that it was instigated by Abdullah bin Saba al-Yahudi. And note his statement "whether in truth or falsehood" and this is a statement that a person whose soul is pure towards the Companions would never make. Qutb took these stances because of the influence of his Communist Socialist Marxist background, and because of that notion of [Communist] "Social Justice" which led him to transgress against the Companions and you will then understand why Mahmood Shakir, when refuting Qutb described Qutb's attacks as "the resentments of the idolatrous western civilization manifesting explosively in the heart of one proclaiming defence of Islam and Jihad in its path" (see here).

Mahmood Shakir refuted Sayyid Qutb in 1952 (see here) for this crime of accusing, out of conviction - not a slip of the tongue - the Companions with such things. Qutb refused to back down in his stance, as we will document in other articles, through Qutb's rebuttal of Mahmood Shakir in the same year. And these statements (or revilment) and many others remained in his book until it reached six editions prior to his death, and it continued to be published by his brother, Mohammad Qutb, decades on. Despite some minor changes in wording, Qutb maintained the essence of his position and retained his attacks upon Uthman, Mu'awiyah, Amr bin al-Aas (radiallaahu anhum), Bani Umayyah and others, in his books.

As for the catalog of revilements of Qutb against Uthmaan (radiallaahu anhu), they will be documented separately inshaa'Allaah, how numerous they are and how repugnant they are.

What's the Deal in a Nutshell?

The realities can be arrived at by looking at what Salaah al-Khaalidee has written in his book (من الميلاد إلى الإستشهاد) "From Birth to Martyrdom" a biography of Qutb (pp. 213-215) regarding the period of "wastage" in Qutb's life.

In this entire section spanning forty or so pages Khaalidee discusses the period of doubt and confusion that Qutb went through for 15 years of his life until the 1940s, and in which he (anda his mentor of the time Abbaas al-Aqqaad, poet, writer, philosopher, existentialist) simply "gulped down" (Khaalidee's expression) the materialist philosophies of the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries.

We can bring a few quotes here from al-Khaalidee. He says (p. 23)

The journey of Qutb's (period) of loss (confusion), is the phase in which he acquired the elementary foundations, of the Jaahilee European and Western ideologies, conceptions and philosophies, concerning existence, life, humanity, and this brought about confusion, gloominess, doubt, and bewilderment and unrest! [In that] it clashed with whatever was with him of affirmations of Islam, which he had acquired since his childhood and youth, and in his various studies.

And then a page later (p. 214)

Sayyid Qutb had informed Abu al-Hasan an-Nadwi, when the latter met him in the year 1951H - after [Qutb] had ended his period of loss (confusion, wastage) - that he had been raised upon the traditions of Islaam in his childhood in the rural town, and when he travelled to Cairo he turned towards literature, literary criticism, and study of culture, civilisation, and he began to take lessons in Western materialist culture, and this made him pass by a phase of doubt (shakk), and uncertainty (irtiyaab) about religious realities - "to the farthest (extremest) limit!" - upon his own words to the letter!

And he then says, after mentioning Qutb turning towards the Qur'an and it's study, (p. 215):

The period of his (Qutb's) wastage continued for about 15 years, and in that period his wastage was not all at one degree or one level, rather it was of varying fluctuating levels.

The whisperings, doubts and suspicions invaded him gradually, and they reached his soul and his imagination gradually, and their effects appeared gradually! And when they took hold of him (became rooted), then their effects appeared upon him in a very clear, "screaming-out" form, and they were mirrored in his outward appearances, in that outward appearances got taken over by them prominently and visibly.

Then their effect began to weaken and diminish gradually, and he would try to rid himself from it with difficulty (hardship) and struggle, and they would appear sometimes in some of his poetical expressions, and they would be hidden and concealed from others!

From the above quotes we see:

A man poisoned with Western and European materialist philosophies for much of his life, with none as his teachers except Abbas al-Aqqaad and the authors of those books he was "gulping" (mostly Western philosophers). He then turned towards Islam and started writing books. And thus, with no knowledge of either the foundations of Islaam or its branches, he brought in his books calamities, upon calamities. The bid'ahs of the Jahmiyyah, Mu'tazilah, Ash'ariyyah, Mufawwidah, Jabariyyah, Ittihaadiyyah, he brought the maxims and philosophies of secular atheist Jews (Communism) and fused them with Islam, claiming Islam is a fusion, blend of such philosophies along with Christianity, he attacked the Companions of Allaah's Messenger on account of the "Social Justice" he envisaged through those Communist Marxist ideals.

Then in 1952 he was instrumental in the July revolution, a Socialist, Marxist, Leninist type revolution through which Jamal Abdul-Nasser came to power, and when he fell out with this former comrade and was put into prison in 1954. He then started penning down the Communist Revolutionary Manifesto embodied in Leninism in his books "Milestones" and "az-Zilal", which became the spring and fountain for the madhhab of the Khawaarij. And he did not outline his revolutionary doctrines because he was imprisoned, being forced due to the circumstances, out of anger and resentment, as some people claim. Rather he was already ideologically upon that, and he'd plotted one successful socialist revolution already.

So the Communist Revolutionary Manifesto and what it contained of the notions of "Social Justice" [think Dhul-Khuwaisarah and the "unfair distribution" of "capital" that was not "just"] and "revolution" [think the revolution of Abdullah bin Saba' against the third Khalifah Uthman (radiallaahu anhu)] - these notions became the backbone for the aqidah of the 20th Century Khawaarij who were nurtured upon the works of Sayyid Qutb, all of whom strangely and ironically enough, came out in the name of "al-Haakimiyyah" itself.

Thank's Marx, Engels and Lenin! You brought the Qutbiyyah their "Social Justice", "State" and "Revolution" - just like those Jews and Christians brought al-Ma'bad al-Juhanee, al-Ja'd bin Dirham and al-Jahm bin Safwan their doctrines of the negation of al-Qadar, the Qur'an being created, and the negation of Allaah's Attributes. And just as those innovators put the Ummah to trial with a mighty tribulation (the fitnah of the creation of the Qur'an), then indeed the 20th century Jahmite Ash'ari, Sufi Mufawwidhs of Egypt put the Ummah to trial with a mighty tribulation with their "fikr" that unleashed untold splits, divisions, vile hizbiyyah like never seen before with fanatical bigotry through the jamaa'aat (groups) and jam'iyyaat (societies) they spawned, let alone the destructive Extremism in Takfir, Takfir of the whole Ummah, of its rulers, scholars and general-folk, in addition to the ideological justification of terrorism in both Muslim and non-Muslim lands against innocent men, women and children.

And then you don't know what to make of these ignorant deluded, intellectually bankrupt people who make their way on to blogs and forums claiming to lift the banner of "Haakimiyyah", propagandizing for Sayyid Qutb, whilst his books are printed, widespread and distributed with this evil perception towards the Islamic Sharee'ah and that evil viewpoint towards the choicest of Companions - except that you think of:

Link to this article:   Show: HTML LinkFull LinkShort Link
Related Articles:
Add a Comment (comments are currently moderated)
You must be registered and logged in to comment.

The Sayings, Verdicts and Rulings of the Scholars of Ahl us-Sunnah Regarding the Doctrines and Books of Sayyid Qutb (21)
Concerning Shaykh Ibn Jibreen's Defence of Hasan al-Banna and Sayyid Qutb (6)
Misguiding the Ummah Through Propaganda For Qutb's Books: An Encyclopedia of the Innovations and Deviations They Contain (13)
The False Comparison Between Hadith Giants Ibn Hajar, an-Nawawi and 20th Century Ignoramuses (2)
Sayyid Qutb and the Aqidah of the Rafidah in Reviling and Abusing the Companions (7)
Sayyid Qutb and the Issue of the Doctrine of 'Wahdat ul-Wujood' (4)
Bayan Talbis al-Qutbiyyah - Explanation of the Deception of the Qutbiyyah (4)
Qutbi Competition Corner - Test Your Aptitude for Defending Baatil (1)
Hasan al-Banna, al-Ikhwan and the Rafidite Shiah (3)
Latest Articles
Shaykh al-Raajihee Declares the Extremist Haddaadiyyah as Liars
Shaykh al-Luhaydan: They Harbour Malice Towards Shaykh Rabee Because He Refutes the Opposers
Shaykh Muqbil bin Haadee: Shaykh Rabee is an Ayah (Sign) in Knowledge of the Hizbiyyeen
Shaykh Muqbil bin Haadee: Shaykh Rabee is Insightful Regarding the Hizbiyyeen and 'Chisels Out' Their Hizbiyyah
Shaykh Muqbil bin Haadee: Shaykh Rabee is From the Taa'ifah Mansoorah and Filters out the Hizbiyyeen
Shaykh Muqbil bin Haadee on Shaykh Rabee: If Shaykh Rabee Says So and So is a Hizbee, Over the Passing of Days, It Will Become Clear That He is a Hizbee
Refutation of the Slander of the Confused Abdullaah al-Farsee Against Shaykh Rabee Regarding the Issue of Iqaamat ul-Hujjah
Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan Asked About Whoever Twisted His Speech to Attack Shaykh Rabee: It is From His Own Desire and He Will Bear the Burden of Sin
A Gift to Salman al-Awdah and Safar al-Hawali: Shaykh Salih al-Fawzan: Being Labelled with 'Jaamiyyah' is a Praise and a Tazkiyah
Sayyid Qutb and Ayatollah Kashani (Both Rafidees) and Abu Zubair Saleem Begg and Abu Fatimah Salman Awan (Both Practical Ghulaat al-Murji'ah)
Want to Start Learning Arabic Online
Search This Site

 Other Websites

Most Popular
A Picture Paints (Characterizes) a Thousand Qutbis: Hasan al-Banna, Sayyid Qutb, Abu A'la Mawdudi, the Rafidah and the Iranian Revolution
Sajid Kayum: The Hypocritical Coward Who Runs The Forums of Amwaat.Morg In Which Slanders and Alleged Sins Are Spread About Other Muslims
Readings in Elementary Communism: Karl Marx, Freidrich Engels, Sayyid Qutb, Capitalism, the State, Social Justice, Revolution and the Communist Manifesto
Regarding Abu al-Hasan al-Ma'ribee al-Ikhwani: Why Shaykh Rabee' Was Correct and Shaykh Abdul-Muhsin al-Abbaad Was Wrong (Yet Both Are Rewarded) - Part 1
The Satanic Path of Sajid Kayum's Slanderhouse Forums Evaluated in Light of the Prophetic Sunnah
Muftee Abdul-Azeez Aal al-Shaykh on the Saying of Sayyid Qutb About Mu'awiyyah and Amr bin al-Aas: It is the Saying of a Baatinee Khabeeth or a Yahoodee La'een and is the Epitomy of Nifaaq
The Relationship Between Shaykh Rabee al-Madkhali and the Major Scholars: Part 3 - Imaam Ibn Baz Requesting Shaykh Rabee in Writing To Refute a Denier of Allaah's Attributes
Sayyid Qutb and the Revolution Organized in Egypt Against the Third Khalifah Uthman bin Affaan
Imaam al-Albani to Shaykh Rabee: Everything With Which You Refuted Qutb For Is Correct and True and May Allaah Reward You For Fulfilling The Obligation of Exposing His Ignorance and Deviance
The Words of Imaam Ibn Baz Falling on Those (Qutbiyyah) Who Lied Upon Him (Safar al-Hawali, Salman al-Awdah, Muhammad Sa'eed al-Qahtani, Aa'id al-Qarnee, Abdur-Razzaq ash-Shayijee): Callers of Falsehood and Stirrers of the Murky Waters

aa'id al-qarnee aa'id al-qarni abbaas al- abbas el-akkad abd al-aziz aal ash-shaikh abdul-aziz aal ash-shaikh abdul-aziz ar-raajihee abdullaah al-farsee abdullah al-farsee abdullah azzam abdullah bin saba' abdur-rahmaan abdul-khaaliq abdur-razzaq ash-shayijee abu a'la mawdudi abu al-hasan al-ma'ribee abu sufyan ahmad shakir ahya al-adaalah al-ijtimaa'iyyah al-arsh albaanee albani alexis carrel al-fawzaan al-fawzan algeria al-ghazali al-ghudayan al-ikwan al-muslimoon al-istiwaa al-luhaidan al-mubarakfuri al-uluww amr khalid an-nawawi aqidah aqqaad ar-razi ash'ari asharis ash'aris ash'arite ash'ariyyah asha'riyyah az-zilal banna barbarism bayaan talbis al-qutbiyyah bayan talbis al-qutbiyyah christianity communism communist manifesto egypt excommunication extremism faith fawzan fi zilal il-quran fi zilal il-qur'an fikr frederick engels george bush ghaddafi ghulaat al-murji'ah ghuluww grave worship haakimiyyah habib ali al-jifree hadd hammad al-ansari hasan al-banna hasan al-maalikee hayyiz hind hudood ibn arabi ibn baaz ibn baz ibn hajar al-asqalani ibn hajr ibn jibreen ibn jibrin ibn saba al-yahudi ibn taymiyyah ibn uthaymeen ibn uthaymin ihyaa al-turaath imaan in the shade of the qur'an iranian revolution irja irjaa irjaa' istibdaal istihzaa jaahiliyyah jahmiyyah jamaa'at ut-takfir jameel zainoo jihah karl marx kashani khabar ul-aahaad khabar ul-wahid khameni kharijites khawarij khomeini khurooj kufr bawah leninism leninists libya madaakhilah madkhali madkhalis mahmood shakir mahmud shakir makaan makhlooq marxism marxist socialism mawdudi milestones mockery mohammad qutb mongols moosaa moses mu'awiyah mufawwidah mufawwidh muhammad al-areefee muhammad bin ibraaheem muhammad bin ibrahim muhammad sa'eed al-qahtani muqbil bin haadee muqbil bin hadi murji'ah nawab safawi nawawi qawaaneen qawanin qsep qur'an qutb qutbi qutbi manhaj qutbis qutbiyyah qutubiyyah raafidah rabi al-madkhali rabi bin hadi al-madkhali rafidah rafidah shi'ah revolutionary ideology safar al-hawali sahaabah sajid kaym sajid kayum salafi manhaj saleem begg salih aal ash-shaykh salih al-luhaydan salman al-aqdah salman al-awdah salman awan saudi saudi arabia sayyid qutb secular law secular laws secularism shaikh rabi shanqeetee shanqiti shaykh abd al-aziz aal ash-shaykh shaykh abd al-aziz bin baz shaykh abdul-aziz bin baz shaykh al-albani shaykh al-luhaydaan shaykh al-uthaymin shaykh ibn jibrin shaykh ibn uthaymin shaykh muhammad amaan al-jaamee shaykh muqbil bin haadee shaykh muqbil bin hadi shaykh rabee shaykh rabee' shaykh rabee bin haadee shaykh rabi shaykh rabi al-madkali shaykh rabi bin hadi al-madkhali shiah shi'ites shirk sifaat fi'liyyah social justice socialism soofee speech of allaah sufi sufism syria tabdeel tafweed tahkeem tahkeem al-qawaaneen tahkim al-qawanin takfeer takfir takfiris takhyeel tamyee' tashree' taswir al-fanni fil-qur'an tatars ta'weel tawhid tawhid al-haakimiyyah tawhid al-hakimiyyah tawhid al-hukm the companions ubaydullah al-mubarakfuri wahdat ul-wujood zilal

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016

© TheMadkhalis.Com. All rights reserved.
Madkhalis Madaakhilah The Madkhalis