Sunday, 28 May 2017    HomeAbout UsContact Us     



You are here: Home / Methodology / Ruling By What Allaah Has Revealed
Shaykh Abdul-Aziz ar-Raajihee on Secular Laws and Abolishing the Entire Sharee'ah
Filed under: Ruling By What Allaah Has Revealed
Monday, February 01 2010 - by Admin
Key topics: Abdul-Aziz Ar-Raajihee Tabdeel Istibdaal

Bookmark and Share

Mail to a FriendPrinter friendly

Shaykh Abdul-Aziz ar-Rajihee's Explanation of the Fourth Nullifier

Shaykh Abdul-Aziz ar-Rajihee, in his commentary upon "Nawaaqid ul-Islaam" of Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn Abdul-Wahhaab, states in relation to the fourth nullifier:

من اعتقد أن غير هدي النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم أكمل من هديه وأن حكم غيره أحسن من حكمه كالذي يفضل حكم الطواغيت على حكمه فهو كافر

Whoever believes that other than the guidance of the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) is more perfect than his guidance or that the judgment of [those] besides him is better than his judgment, such as the one who considers the judgment of the tawaagheet to be preferential (i.e. better and preferred) over his (the Prophet's) judgement, then he is a kaafir.

After explaining that whoever considers a guidance such as that of the Sufiyyah, or the Philosophers or the Sabeans, to be better than the guidance of the Prophet (alayhis salaam) that such a one invalidates his Islaam, he comments upon the issue of judgement (al-hukm) with the following:

وكذلك إذا اعتقد أن هناك حكما أحسن من حكم النبي صلى الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم كأن يعتقد أن الحكم بالقوانين أحسن من الحكم بالشريعة فهذا مرتد بإجماع المسلمين. وكذلك إذا اعتقد أن الحكم بالقوانين مماثل لحكم الشريعة يكفر أيضا .

وكذلك إذا اعتقد أن الحكم بالشريعة أحسن من الحكم بالقوانين، لكن يجوز الحكم بالقوانين كأن يقول : الإنسان مخير يجوز له أن يحم بالقوانين، ويجوز له أن يحكم بالشريعة، لكن الشريعة أحسن فهذا يكفر بإجماع المسلمين فالإنسان ليس مخيرا، وهذا أنكر معلوما من الدين بالضرورة؛ فالحكم بالشريعة هذا أمر واجب على كل أحد وهذا يقول : إنه ليس بواجب وأنه يجوز للإنسان أن يحكم بالقوانين فهذا يكفر ولو قال : إن أحكام الشريعة أحسن

And likewise, if he believes that there is a judgment better than the judgment of the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wa alaa aalihi wasallam), such as [a person] believing that judging by the Secular Laws is better than judging by the Sharee'ah, then such a one is an apostate by consensus of the Muslims. And likewise when he believes that judging by the Secular Laws is equivalent to judgment of the Sharee'ah, he also disbelieves.

And likewise, if he believes that judging by the Sharee'ah is better than judging by the Secular Laws but that it is permissible to judge by the Secular Laws, such as when he says, "A person has the choice, it is permissible for him to judge by the Secular Laws, and it is permissible for him to judge by the Sharee'ah, but the Sharee'ah is better", then such a one disbelieves by consensus of the Muslims, for a person does not have the choice, because this one has rejected what is known in the religion by necessity. Judging by the Sharee'ah, this is a matter obligatory upon everybody, yet this one says, "It is not waajib, but that it is permissible for a person to judge by secular laws", this one disbelieves, even if he said, "The laws of the Sharee'ah are better".

فعلى هذا : إذا حكم بالقوانين واعتقد أنها أحسن من حكم الشريعة كفر وإذا حكم بالقوانين واعتقد أنها مماثلة لحكم الشريعة كفر وإذا حكم بالقوانين واعتقد أن حكم الشريعة أحسن من الحكم بالقوانين لكن يجوز الحكم بالقوانين كفر أيضا ففي الحالات الثلاث كلها يكفر

Built upon this:

  • When he judges by the Secular Laws and believes they are better than the judgment of the Sharee'ah, he disbelieves

  • When he judges by the Secular Laws and believes they are equivalent to the judgement of the Sharee'ah, he disbeleives

  • When he believes that the judgment of the Sharee'ah is better than judgment by the Secular Laws but [believes] that it is permissible to judge by the Secular Laws, he disbelieves also.

So in all of these three conditions he disbelieves.

وهناك حالة رابعة إذا حكم بالقوانين أو بالقانون في مسألة من المسائل أو في قضية من القضايا وهو يعتقد أن الحكم بالشريعة هو الواجب، وأنه لا يجوز الحكم بالقوانين، وأنه لا يجوز أن يحكم بغير ما أنزل الله وهو يعتقد أنه ظالم وأنه مستحق للعقوبة لكن غلبته نفسه وهواه وشيطانه فحكم بغير ما أنزل الله، حكم بغير ما أنزل الله لشخص حتى ينفع المحكوم له أو حتى يضر المحكوم عليه، فينفع المحكوم له ؛ لأنه صديق له أو قريب له، أو جار له، أو يضر المحكوم عليه لأنه عدو له، وهو يعلم أن الحكم يما أنزل الله واجب وأنه مرتكب للمعصية هذا يكفر كفرا أصغر ولا يخرج من الملة .

فيكون الحكم بغير ما أنزل الله أربع حالات، ثلاث حالات يكفر فيها كفرا أكبر، والرابعة يكفر كفرا أصغر

And there is a fourth situation, when he judges by the Secular Laws, or by a Secular Law in an issue amongst the issues or in an affair amongst the affairs, whilst he believes that judgment by the Sharee'ah is obligatory, and that it is not permissible for him to judge by the Secular Laws, and that it is not permissible for him to judge by other than what Allaah has revealed, and he believes he is a transgressor, and that is deserving of punishment, but his soul overcomes him and his desire and his devil (overcomes him) and thus he judges by other than what Allaah has revealed, he judges by other than what Allaah revealed in favour of a person such that he benefits the one in whose favour he made the judgment or harms the one against whom the judgment was made, and thus benefits the one in whose favour the judgment was made, because he is a friend of his, or a relative of his, or a neighbour of his, or he harms the one against whom the judgment was made because he is an enemy to him, whilst he knows that judging by what Allaah has ruled is obligatory, and that he is committing disobedience, then this one disbelieves with a minor disbelief which does not expel from the religion.

Therefore, ruling by other than what Allaah has revealed has four conditions, three of them in which he disbelieves with the major disbelief and the fourth in which he disbelieves with the minor disbelief.

مسألة : ( حكم إزالة الشريعة كلها والحكم بالقوانين ): إذا كان سن القوانين كلها، وأزال الشريعة كلها رأسا على عقب هذا بدل الدين، وهذا ذهب جمع من أهل العلم إلى أنه يكفر لأنه بدل دين الله، وهذا هو الذي أفتى به سماحة الشيخ محمد بن إبراهيم - رحمه الله - مفتي الديار السعودية سابقا قال : إن هذا بدل الدين رأسا على عقب ليس في قضية من القضايا، إنما بدل الأحكام كلها فأزال الشريعة كلها وأبدلها بالقوانين في كل صغيرة وكبيرة .

Issue: Abolishing the Entire Sharee'ah and Judging by the Secular Laws

When [a person] legislates Secular Laws, all of them, and abolishes the Sharee'ah all of it, [completely] from head to toe, this is changing the religion, and a group from the people of knowledge have gone to [the view] that he disbelieves, because he has changed the deen of Allaah, and this is the verdict that the esteemed Shaykh Muhammad bin Ibraaheem (rahimahullaah), the previous Muftee of the Land of Saudiyyah, gave, [he said]: This is changing the religion, from head to toe, not in an issue amongst the issues but he changed all of the laws, and thus he abolished the Sharee'ah all of it, and changed it with the Secular Laws in every small and big matter.

وذهب سماحة شيخنا الشيخ عبد العزيز بن باز - وفقه الله - إلى أنه أيضا ولو بدل الدين لا بد أن يعتقد أنه يجوز الحكم بالقوانين حتى تقوم عليه الحجة . إذن هذه هي الحالة الخامسة وهي إذا بدل الدين .

And our esteemed Shaykh, Abdul-Aziz bin Baz (may Allaah grant him success) has gone [to the view] also that even if he changed the religion, it is necessary that he [also] believe that it is permissible to judge by the Secular Laws such that the proof is established upon him. Thus, this is the fifth situation, which is when he changes (the entire) religion.

The absence of Takfir of the one who legislated laws and imposed them upon the people as a dustoor (constitution) to be followed was the last view of Shaykh Ibn Uthaymin (rahimahullaah) in 1421H, (to be documented with audio) and on this topic, the sayings of Imaam Ibn Baz, Imaam Ibn Uthaymin and Imaam al-Albani are in agreement.

As for the saying of the group of Scholars (such as Ibn Katheer and Ibn Ibraaheem and al-Fawzan), then they are speaking about the entire Sharee'ah, from head to toe, in every matter, small and large.

The Qutbiyyah (Leninist Takfiris) emerged in the 1960s and they made Takfir of all nations and societies due to the absence of complete rule by the Sharee'ah. If it was not 100%, that government, nation, society is apostate. When they were refuted with the tafseel of the Salaf, they then found refuge in these particular verdicts of some of the Scholars, and then they began to argue for their Takfir again. With this polemic they spread much confusion through the 90s. The reality is that there is no ruler today who has abolished the Sharee'ah from head to toe. Most of the Secular Laws present in the Muslim lands have been there for hundreds of years and came from the era of colonialism and imperialism, and rulers come and go in situations in which Secular Laws are already part of the structure of that state.

This means that the actual rulings that would apply to the situation predominant today - if we put aside the issue of other nawaaqid (nullifiers) that may apply to one side - is based upon whether the rulers in those lands in which Secular Laws are found in greater or lesser amounts rule by them a) believing in their superiority over the Sharee'ah b) believing in their equivalence to the Sharee'ah or c) believing in their permissibility. Unfortunately, this does not allow the Qutbiyyah Takfiriyyah to justify their Takfir. From this you can now understand the great necessity for the Qutbiyyah to cause confusion through this particular matter. It's all to do with eliciting Takfir to justify the Leninist methodologies of Qutb and the pluralist, mass-populist methodologies of Banna.

What further exposes their fraud is that despite their use of these verdicts of the Scholars who hold this particular view, none of these Scholars were or are with these Leninist Takfiris in their Takfir of countries such as those in the Gulf, and in their revolutionary methodologies which come from the fikr of Qutb and Banna taken from the prevalent 19th and 20th century ideologies and philosophies (revolutions and mass-populist, pluralist movements) to establish "Social Justice".

وهناك حالة سادسة وهي أن الحاكم الشرعي إذا بذل وسعه، واستفرغ جهده في تعرف الحكم الشرعي لكن أخطأ وحكم بغير ما أنزل الله خطأً فهذا ليس كافرا ولا عاصيا بل هو مجتهد له أجر واحد لقول النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم [ إذا اجتهد الحاكم فأصاب فله أجران , وإذا اجتهد فأخطأ فله أجر ] فهذا خطأه مغفور وله أجر على اجتهاده . وإذا بذل وسعه وأصاب الحق فله أجران أجر الاجتهاد وأجر الإصابة .

And there is a sixth situation which is that the Sharee'ah judge, when he strives, and expends effort to come to know the Sharee'ah ruling [in a matter] but he erred and judged by other than what Allaah revealed, [this is] an error, and this one is not a disbeliever, and nor disobedient, rather he is a mujtahid and he has one reward, due to the saying of the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam), "When a rule strives (in a judgment) and is correct, he has two rewards, and when he strives (in a judgment) and errs, he has one reward." Thus, the error of this one is forgiven and he has one reward for his ijtihaad, and when he strives and expends effort and arrives at the truth then he has two rewards, the reward of making ijtihaad and the reward of being correct.

Please refer also to:



Link to this article:   Show: HTML LinkFull LinkShort Link
Related Articles:
Add a Comment (comments are currently moderated)
You must be registered and logged in to comment.


The Sayings, Verdicts and Rulings of the Scholars of Ahl us-Sunnah Regarding the Doctrines and Books of Sayyid Qutb (21)
Concerning Shaykh Ibn Jibreen's Defence of Hasan al-Banna and Sayyid Qutb (6)
Misguiding the Ummah Through Propaganda For Qutb's Books: An Encyclopedia of the Innovations and Deviations They Contain (13)
The False Comparison Between Hadith Giants Ibn Hajar, an-Nawawi and 20th Century Ignoramuses (2)
Sayyid Qutb and the Aqidah of the Rafidah in Reviling and Abusing the Companions (7)
Sayyid Qutb and the Issue of the Doctrine of 'Wahdat ul-Wujood' (4)
Bayan Talbis al-Qutbiyyah - Explanation of the Deception of the Qutbiyyah (4)
Qutbi Competition Corner - Test Your Aptitude for Defending Baatil (1)
Hasan al-Banna, al-Ikhwan and the Rafidite Shiah (3)
Latest Articles
Shaykh al-Raajihee Declares the Extremist Haddaadiyyah as Liars
Shaykh al-Luhaydan: They Harbour Malice Towards Shaykh Rabee Because He Refutes the Opposers
Shaykh Muqbil bin Haadee: Shaykh Rabee is an Ayah (Sign) in Knowledge of the Hizbiyyeen
Shaykh Muqbil bin Haadee: Shaykh Rabee is Insightful Regarding the Hizbiyyeen and 'Chisels Out' Their Hizbiyyah
Shaykh Muqbil bin Haadee: Shaykh Rabee is From the Taa'ifah Mansoorah and Filters out the Hizbiyyeen
Shaykh Muqbil bin Haadee on Shaykh Rabee: If Shaykh Rabee Says So and So is a Hizbee, Over the Passing of Days, It Will Become Clear That He is a Hizbee
Refutation of the Slander of the Confused Abdullaah al-Farsee Against Shaykh Rabee Regarding the Issue of Iqaamat ul-Hujjah
Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan Asked About Whoever Twisted His Speech to Attack Shaykh Rabee: It is From His Own Desire and He Will Bear the Burden of Sin
A Gift to Salman al-Awdah and Safar al-Hawali: Shaykh Salih al-Fawzan: Being Labelled with 'Jaamiyyah' is a Praise and a Tazkiyah
Sayyid Qutb and Ayatollah Kashani (Both Rafidees) and Abu Zubair Saleem Begg and Abu Fatimah Salman Awan (Both Practical Ghulaat al-Murji'ah)
Learnarabic.Com
Search This Site

 Other Websites
 Takfiris.Com

Most Popular
A Picture Paints (Characterizes) a Thousand Qutbis: Hasan al-Banna, Sayyid Qutb, Abu A'la Mawdudi, the Rafidah and the Iranian Revolution
Sajid Kayum: The Hypocritical Coward Who Runs The Forums of Amwaat.Morg In Which Slanders and Alleged Sins Are Spread About Other Muslims
Readings in Elementary Communism: Karl Marx, Freidrich Engels, Sayyid Qutb, Capitalism, the State, Social Justice, Revolution and the Communist Manifesto
The Relationship Between Shaykh Rabee al-Madkhali and the Major Scholars: Part 3 - Imaam Ibn Baz Requesting Shaykh Rabee in Writing To Refute a Denier of Allaah's Attributes
The Satanic Path of Sajid Kayum's Slanderhouse Forums Evaluated in Light of the Prophetic Sunnah
Sayyid Qutb and the Revolution Organized in Egypt Against the Third Khalifah Uthman bin Affaan
Regarding Abu al-Hasan al-Ma'ribee al-Ikhwani: Why Shaykh Rabee' Was Correct and Shaykh Abdul-Muhsin al-Abbaad Was Wrong (Yet Both Are Rewarded) - Part 1
Muftee Abdul-Azeez Aal al-Shaykh on the Saying of Sayyid Qutb About Mu'awiyyah and Amr bin al-Aas: It is the Saying of a Baatinee Khabeeth or a Yahoodee La'een and is the Epitomy of Nifaaq
Shaykh Muhammad bin Saalih al-Uthaymeen Distinguished Between The Salafi Manhaj and The Qutbi Manhaj and Wholeheartedly Reccommended Warning From the Qutbi Manhaj After Detailed Study and Consideration
The Words of Imaam Ibn Baz Falling on Those (Qutbiyyah) Who Lied Upon Him (Safar al-Hawali, Salman al-Awdah, Muhammad Sa'eed al-Qahtani, Aa'id al-Qarnee, Abdur-Razzaq ash-Shayijee): Callers of Falsehood and Stirrers of the Murky Waters

Tags
aa'id al-qarnee aa'id al-qarni abbaas al- abbas el-akkad abd al-aziz aal ash-shaikh abdul-aziz aal ash-shaikh abdul-aziz ar-raajihee abdullaah al-farsee abdullah al-farsee abdullah azzam abdullah bin saba' abdur-rahmaan abdul-khaaliq abdur-razzaq ash-shayijee abu a'la mawdudi abu al-hasan al-ma'ribee abu sufyan ahmad shakir ahya al-adaalah al-ijtimaa'iyyah al-arsh albaanee albani alexis carrel al-fawzaan al-fawzan algeria al-ghazali al-ghudayan al-ikwan al-muslimoon al-istiwaa al-luhaidan al-mubarakfuri al-uluww amr khalid an-nawawi aqidah aqqaad ar-razi ash'ari asharis ash'aris ash'arite ash'ariyyah asha'riyyah az-zilal banna barbarism bayaan talbis al-qutbiyyah bayan talbis al-qutbiyyah christianity communism communist manifesto egypt excommunication extremism faith fawzan fi zilal il-quran fi zilal il-qur'an fikr frederick engels george bush ghaddafi ghulaat al-murji'ah ghuluww grave worship haakimiyyah habib ali al-jifree hadd hammad al-ansari hasan al-banna hasan al-maalikee hayyiz hind hudood ibn arabi ibn baaz ibn baz ibn hajar al-asqalani ibn hajr ibn jibreen ibn jibrin ibn saba al-yahudi ibn taymiyyah ibn uthaymeen ibn uthaymin ihyaa al-turaath imaan in the shade of the qur'an iranian revolution irja irjaa irjaa' istibdaal istihzaa jaahiliyyah jahmiyyah jamaa'at ut-takfir jameel zainoo jihah karl marx kashani khabar ul-aahaad khabar ul-wahid khameni kharijites khawarij khomeini khurooj kufr bawah leninism leninists libya madaakhilah madkhali madkhalis mahmood shakir mahmud shakir makaan makhlooq marxism marxist socialism mawdudi milestones mockery mohammad qutb mongols moosaa moses mu'awiyah mufawwidah mufawwidh muhammad al-areefee muhammad bin ibraaheem muhammad bin ibrahim muhammad sa'eed al-qahtani muqbil bin haadee muqbil bin hadi murji'ah nawab safawi nawawi qawaaneen qawanin qsep qur'an qutb qutbi qutbi manhaj qutbis qutbiyyah qutubiyyah raafidah rabi al-madkhali rabi bin hadi al-madkhali rafidah rafidah shi'ah revolutionary ideology safar al-hawali sahaabah sajid kaym sajid kayum salafi manhaj saleem begg salih aal ash-shaykh salih al-luhaydan salman al-aqdah salman al-awdah salman awan saudi saudi arabia sayyid qutb secular law secular laws secularism shaikh rabi shanqeetee shanqiti shaykh abd al-aziz aal ash-shaykh shaykh abd al-aziz bin baz shaykh abdul-aziz bin baz shaykh al-albani shaykh al-luhaydaan shaykh al-uthaymin shaykh ibn jibrin shaykh ibn uthaymin shaykh muhammad amaan al-jaamee shaykh muqbil bin haadee shaykh muqbil bin hadi shaykh rabee shaykh rabee' shaykh rabee bin haadee shaykh rabi shaykh rabi al-madkali shaykh rabi bin hadi al-madkhali shiah shi'ites shirk sifaat fi'liyyah social justice socialism soofee speech of allaah sufi sufism syria tabdeel tafweed tahkeem tahkeem al-qawaaneen tahkim al-qawanin takfeer takfir takfiris takhyeel tamyee' tashree' taswir al-fanni fil-qur'an tatars ta'weel tawhid tawhid al-haakimiyyah tawhid al-hakimiyyah tawhid al-hukm the companions ubaydullah al-mubarakfuri wahdat ul-wujood zilal

Archives
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009


© TheMadkhalis.Com. All rights reserved.
Madkhalis Madaakhilah The Madkhalis