Tuesday, 12 December 2017    HomeAbout UsContact Us     



You are here: Home / Sayyid Qutb
Sayyid Qutb and the Aqidah of the Ash'ariyyah Jahmiyyah: Part 6 - Imaan is a Single Entity It Is Not Divisible and the Madhhab of the Khawaarij and Murji'ah
Filed under: Sayyid Qutb
Monday, December 28 2009 - by Admin
Key topics: Imaan Faith Irjaa' Murji'ah

Bookmark and Share

Mail to a FriendPrinter friendly

The Saying that Imaan is a Single Entity That Is Not Subject to Divisibility Is the Foundation of the Bid'ahs of the Khawaarij and the Murji'ah

Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah said (Majmoo' al-Fataawaa 7/223):

وأما قول القائل : إن الإيمان إذا ذهب بعضه ذهب كله فهذا ممنوع وهذا هو الأصل الذي تفرعت عنه البدع في الإيمان فإنهم ظنوا أنه متى ذهب بعضه ذهب كله لم يبق منه شيء . ثم قالت " الخوارج والمعتزلة " : هو مجموع ما أمر الله به ورسوله وهو الإيمان المطلق كما قاله أهل الحديث ; قالوا : فإذا ذهب شيء منه لم يبق مع صاحبه من الإيمان شيء فيخلد في النار وقالت " المرجئة " على اختلاف فرقهم : لا تذهب الكبائر وترك الواجبات الظاهرة شيئا من الإيمان إذ لو ذهب شيء منه لم يبق منه شيء فيكون شيئا واحدا يستوي فيه البر والفاجر ونصوص الرسول وأصحابه تدل على ذهاب بعضه وبقاء بعضه ; كقوله : " { يخرج من النار من كان في قلبه مثقال ذرة من إيمان } " . ولهذا كان " أهل السنة والحديث " على أنه يتفاضل وجمهورهم يقولون : يزيد وينقص

As for the saying of the sayer [that]: "If something of eemaan disappears, then all of it disappears, and this is prohibited." And this is the foundation uopn which the innovations regarding eemaan branched off from. For they thought that when some of it (eemaan) goes, then all of it goes, [that] nothing remains from it.

Then the "Khawaarij and Mu'tazilah" said: It (eemaan) is the entirety of what Allaah and His Messenger have commanded, and it is the absolute eemaan, just as Ahl al-Hadeeth have said. They (the Khawaarij, Mu'tazilah) said, "So when something of it goes, nothing of eemaan remains at all in its [former] possessor, and thus he will remain eternally in the Fire".

And the Murji'ah, upon all of their varying factions, said: "Major sins and abandoning the obligations do not take anything away from eemaan, since if something of it went, then nothing of it would remain, and thus it is a single entity, the righteous and sinful are equal with respect to it".

And the texts of the Messenger and his companions indicate the departing of some of it and the remaining of some of it, such as [in] his saying, "There will leave from the Hellfire one in whose heart is an seed's weight of eemaan", and it is for this reason that Ahl us-Sunnah wal-Hadeeth were upon [the belief] the [the believers in their] eemaan can excel [over each other], and they say, "It (eemaan) increases and decreases".

And this is clear in explaining the creed of Ahl us-Sunnah wal-Hadeeth.

The Foundations of the Bid'ah of the Khawaarij in the Works of Sayyid Qutb

There are many places in the works of Sayyid Qutb where we see the origins of the bid'ah of Khawaarij, but one of the most foundational ones, is this statement here in az-Zilaal (2/798):

إن الإيمان وحدة لا تتجزأ

Indeed, eemaan is a singular (entity), it is not divisible (into parts).

To see this principle at work in the ideology of Sayyid Qutb is in his exaggeration in the issue of Haakimiyyah, leading to Takfir of all Muslim societies upon the earth and calling for a violent revolutionary (Leninist) Jihaad against them. This has been noted about him by the Scholars of Ahl us-Sunnah, as well as prominent figureheads in al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen, and also Muhammad Abdul-Lateef as-Subkee, the head of the Committee of Verdicts of the University of al-Azhar, wrote a refutation of "Milestones" in 1965 (will be documented in a separate article). He (Qutb) says (az-Zilaal 2/887-888):

واللّه - سبحانه - يقول : إن المسألة - في هذا كله - مسألة إيمان أو كفر أو إسلام أو جاهلية وشرع أو هوى. وإنه لا وسط في هذا الأمر ولا هدنة ولا صلح! فالمؤمنون هم الذين يحكمون بما أنزل اللّه - لا يخرمون منه حرفا ولا يبدلون منه شيئا - والكافرون الظالمون الفاسقون هم الذين لا يحكمون بما أنزل اللّه. وأنه إما أن يكون الحكام قائمين على شريعة اللّه كاملة فهم في نطاق الإيمان. وإما أن يكونوا قائمين على شريعة أخرى مما لم يأذن به اللّه ، فهم الكافرون الظالمون الفاسقون. وأن الناس إما أن يقبلوا من الحكام والقضاة حكم اللّه وقضاءه في أمورهم فهم مؤمنون .. وإلا فما هم بالمؤمنين .. ولا وسط بين هذا الطريق وذاك ولا حجة ولا معذرة ، ولا احتجاج بمصل

And Allaah, the Sublime, says: Certainly, the [underlying] issue in all of this is the issue of [either] Imaan or kufr, Islaam or jaahiliyyah, and the legislation or the desire. And certainly there is no in-between state in this affair. There is no truce or any treaty (in this affair)! The believers are those who judge by what Allaah has revealed - they do not distort a single letter from it, and nor do they replace any of it whatsoever. And the disbelievers, the oppressors and sinners, they are the ones who do not judge by what Allaah has revealed. Either the rulers are upholding the Sharee'ah in its complete entirety (kaamilatan), and hence they are within the confines of Imaan, or they are upholding other legislations, those for which Allaah has not given any authority. Hence, they are disbelievers, oppressors, and sinners. And either the people [those ruled over] accept the law and decision of Allaah from the rulers and judges in their affairs, so that they are believers ... and if not then they are not believers. And there is no middle path between this path or that path, and nor is their any evidence and nor is there any excuse (ma'dhirah) and nor any seeking to use the excuse of an attainable benefit (maslaha)...

In this quote we see statements which are correct, namely, the obligation to judge by what Allaah has revealed, and to accept it and so on, but mixed with such absolutions and exaggerations that led the Leninist-Takfiris who emerged in the 60s, to make Takfir of all Muslim societies, nations and governments, and all the people within those societies who fall into major sins - see this article from Shaykh Saalih Aal ash-Shaykh on Qutb's exaggeration in that regard.

Regarding what Qutb said right at the very end of negating any excuse, or the excuse of considering a maslahah, where he said, "And there is no middle path between this path or that path, and nor is their any evidence and nor is there any excuse (ma'dhirah) and nor any seeking to use the excuse of an attainable benefit (maslaha)", then Ibn Jibreen considers this legitimate and applicable in a saying of his which can be found here, and it is a statement that on its own has invalidated, demolished and laid to waste the very foundation of Vladimir Lenin's Qutb's revolutionary manhaj by contradicting the very premise upon which Qutb made Takfir of all societies. Go and read that article here, it is a must read. Whilst the Takfiri-Leninists hold onto the speech of Shaykh Ibn Jibreen in defence of Sayyid Qutb, he certainly did not agree with their corruption, Extremism and exaggeration in this particular issue of Takfir. This is a hujjah against them. He considers "the majority of rulers of today" to be upon ruling by some of the Secular Laws through ijtihaad, on account of which he considers them in error, but not guilty of kufr. This same meaning has also been stated by other Scholars such as Shaykh Ibn Uthaymeen where they withhold from Takfir on the basis that the rulers are making ijtihaad in some of these issues and may also be misled by ignorant scholars who are around them.

Coming back to Qutb's quote, we can see that to him, eemaan can only exist if every single element of the Sharee'ah is in place and the ruler is ruling by it all. A situation that has not existed for 1400 years, ever since kingship appeared in the Ummah.

Abu Umaamah relates that the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) said:

لتنقضن عرى الإسلام عروة عروة فكلما انتقضت عروة تشبث الناس بالتي تليها فأولهن نقضا الحكم و آخرهن الصلاة

The handholds of Islaam will be annulled, one by one, and every time a handhold is annulled the people will hold fast to the one that follows it. The first of them to be annulled is the rule (al-hukm), and the last of them is the prayer (as-salaat).

Reported by Ahmad in his Musnad, Ibn Hibbaan and al-Haakim. Saheeh al-Jaami' as-Sagheer (no. 5057) of Shaykh al-Albaanee who declared it Saheeh.

And Shaykh Abdul-Azeez bin Baz (rahimahullaah) commented, upon the previous hadeeth (as occurs in Majmoo' ul-Fataawa wa Maqaalaat al-Mutanawwi'ah):

ومعنى قوله في الحديث: "وأولها نقضاً الحكم" معناه ظاهر وهو: عدم الحكم بشرع الله وهذا هو الواقع اليوم في غالب الدول المنتسبة للإسلام. ومعلوم أن الواجب على الجميع هو الحكم بشريعة الله في كل شيء والحذر من الحكم بالقوانين والأعراف المخالفة للشرع المطهر

And the meaning of his saying in the hadeeth: "The first of them to be anulled is the rule (al-hukm)", its meaning is apparent, and it is the absence of ruling by the legislation of Allaah, and this is what is present today in most of the states ascribing to Islaam. And it is known that what is obligatory upon all is to judge by the Sharee'ah of Allaah in all things and to beware of judging by the Secular Laws, and the customs that oppose the pure legislation.

Whilst Shaykh Ibn Baz states the obligation to rule by what Allaah has revealed in all affairs, he along with the scholars of Ahl us-Sunnah, do not make unrestricted Takfir on account of the presence of Secular Laws in greater or lesser amounts, except with the well-known tafseel (detail) that is found in many of his verdicts.

As for Qutb, if there is no complete rule, then it is kufr. The ruler is a kaafir. The government is kaafirah. And all associatead govermental bodies are kaafirah. And if the people obey the government, even if its out of disobedience, and acknowledgment of sin, they are kaafirs too - (see here). Its' black or white and there is no in-between state. This extremely dangerous doctrine, coupled with the Leninist-Marxist Revolutionary Ideology upon which Qutb wrote Milestones and az-Zilaal (alongside the doctrines of the Jahmiyyah, Mu'tazilah, and As'hariyyah), is why many prominent figureheads from al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen themselves as well as the Scholars of Ahl us-Sunnah have pointed to Qutb as the reviver of the Khawaarij in the 20th century, and we shall document these statements in other articles inshaa'Allaah.



Link to this article:   Show: HTML LinkFull LinkShort Link
Related Articles:
Add a Comment (comments are currently moderated)
You must be registered and logged in to comment.


The Sayings, Verdicts and Rulings of the Scholars of Ahl us-Sunnah Regarding the Doctrines and Books of Sayyid Qutb (21)
Concerning Shaykh Ibn Jibreen's Defence of Hasan al-Banna and Sayyid Qutb (6)
Misguiding the Ummah Through Propaganda For Qutb's Books: An Encyclopedia of the Innovations and Deviations They Contain (13)
The False Comparison Between Hadith Giants Ibn Hajar, an-Nawawi and 20th Century Ignoramuses (2)
Sayyid Qutb and the Aqidah of the Rafidah in Reviling and Abusing the Companions (7)
Sayyid Qutb and the Issue of the Doctrine of 'Wahdat ul-Wujood' (4)
Bayan Talbis al-Qutbiyyah - Explanation of the Deception of the Qutbiyyah (4)
Qutbi Competition Corner - Test Your Aptitude for Defending Baatil (1)
Hasan al-Banna, al-Ikhwan and the Rafidite Shiah (3)
Latest Articles
Shaykh al-Raajihee Declares the Extremist Haddaadiyyah as Liars
Shaykh al-Luhaydan: They Harbour Malice Towards Shaykh Rabee Because He Refutes the Opposers
Shaykh Muqbil bin Haadee: Shaykh Rabee is an Ayah (Sign) in Knowledge of the Hizbiyyeen
Shaykh Muqbil bin Haadee: Shaykh Rabee is Insightful Regarding the Hizbiyyeen and 'Chisels Out' Their Hizbiyyah
Shaykh Muqbil bin Haadee: Shaykh Rabee is From the Taa'ifah Mansoorah and Filters out the Hizbiyyeen
Shaykh Muqbil bin Haadee on Shaykh Rabee: If Shaykh Rabee Says So and So is a Hizbee, Over the Passing of Days, It Will Become Clear That He is a Hizbee
Refutation of the Slander of the Confused Abdullaah al-Farsee Against Shaykh Rabee Regarding the Issue of Iqaamat ul-Hujjah
Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan Asked About Whoever Twisted His Speech to Attack Shaykh Rabee: It is From His Own Desire and He Will Bear the Burden of Sin
A Gift to Salman al-Awdah and Safar al-Hawali: Shaykh Salih al-Fawzan: Being Labelled with 'Jaamiyyah' is a Praise and a Tazkiyah
Sayyid Qutb and Ayatollah Kashani (Both Rafidees) and Abu Zubair Saleem Begg and Abu Fatimah Salman Awan (Both Practical Ghulaat al-Murji'ah)
Help with Arabic Verbs
Search This Site

 Other Websites
 Takfiris.Com

Most Popular
A Picture Paints (Characterizes) a Thousand Qutbis: Hasan al-Banna, Sayyid Qutb, Abu A'la Mawdudi, the Rafidah and the Iranian Revolution
Sajid Kayum: The Hypocritical Coward Who Runs The Forums of Amwaat.Morg In Which Slanders and Alleged Sins Are Spread About Other Muslims
Readings in Elementary Communism: Karl Marx, Freidrich Engels, Sayyid Qutb, Capitalism, the State, Social Justice, Revolution and the Communist Manifesto
The Relationship Between Shaykh Rabee al-Madkhali and the Major Scholars: Part 3 - Imaam Ibn Baz Requesting Shaykh Rabee in Writing To Refute a Denier of Allaah's Attributes
The Satanic Path of Sajid Kayum's Slanderhouse Forums Evaluated in Light of the Prophetic Sunnah
Sayyid Qutb and the Revolution Organized in Egypt Against the Third Khalifah Uthman bin Affaan
Regarding Abu al-Hasan al-Ma'ribee al-Ikhwani: Why Shaykh Rabee' Was Correct and Shaykh Abdul-Muhsin al-Abbaad Was Wrong (Yet Both Are Rewarded) - Part 1
Muftee Abdul-Azeez Aal al-Shaykh on the Saying of Sayyid Qutb About Mu'awiyyah and Amr bin al-Aas: It is the Saying of a Baatinee Khabeeth or a Yahoodee La'een and is the Epitomy of Nifaaq
Shaykh Muhammad bin Saalih al-Uthaymeen Distinguished Between The Salafi Manhaj and The Qutbi Manhaj and Wholeheartedly Reccommended Warning From the Qutbi Manhaj After Detailed Study and Consideration
The Words of Imaam Ibn Baz Falling on Those (Qutbiyyah) Who Lied Upon Him (Safar al-Hawali, Salman al-Awdah, Muhammad Sa'eed al-Qahtani, Aa'id al-Qarnee, Abdur-Razzaq ash-Shayijee): Callers of Falsehood and Stirrers of the Murky Waters

Tags
aa'id al-qarnee aa'id al-qarni abbaas al- abbas el-akkad abd al-aziz aal ash-shaikh abdul-aziz aal ash-shaikh abdul-aziz ar-raajihee abdullaah al-farsee abdullah al-farsee abdullah azzam abdullah bin saba' abdur-rahmaan abdul-khaaliq abdur-razzaq ash-shayijee abu a'la mawdudi abu al-hasan al-ma'ribee abu sufyan ahmad shakir ahya al-adaalah al-ijtimaa'iyyah al-arsh albaanee albani alexis carrel al-fawzaan al-fawzan algeria al-ghazali al-ghudayan al-ikwan al-muslimoon al-istiwaa al-luhaidan al-mubarakfuri al-uluww amr khalid an-nawawi aqidah aqqaad ar-razi ash'ari asharis ash'aris ash'arite ash'ariyyah asha'riyyah az-zilal banna barbarism bayaan talbis al-qutbiyyah bayan talbis al-qutbiyyah christianity communism communist manifesto egypt excommunication extremism faith fawzan fi zilal il-quran fi zilal il-qur'an fikr frederick engels george bush ghaddafi ghulaat al-murji'ah ghuluww grave worship haakimiyyah habib ali al-jifree hadd hammad al-ansari hasan al-banna hasan al-maalikee hayyiz hind hudood ibn arabi ibn baaz ibn baz ibn hajar al-asqalani ibn hajr ibn jibreen ibn jibrin ibn saba al-yahudi ibn taymiyyah ibn uthaymeen ibn uthaymin ihyaa al-turaath imaan in the shade of the qur'an iranian revolution irja irjaa irjaa' istibdaal istihzaa jaahiliyyah jahmiyyah jamaa'at ut-takfir jameel zainoo jihah karl marx kashani khabar ul-aahaad khabar ul-wahid khameni kharijites khawarij khomeini khurooj kufr bawah leninism leninists libya madaakhilah madkhali madkhalis mahmood shakir mahmud shakir makaan makhlooq marxism marxist socialism mawdudi milestones mockery mohammad qutb mongols moosaa moses mu'awiyah mufawwidah mufawwidh muhammad al-areefee muhammad bin ibraaheem muhammad bin ibrahim muhammad sa'eed al-qahtani muqbil bin haadee muqbil bin hadi murji'ah nawab safawi nawawi qawaaneen qawanin qsep qur'an qutb qutbi qutbi manhaj qutbis qutbiyyah qutubiyyah raafidah rabi al-madkhali rabi bin hadi al-madkhali rafidah rafidah shi'ah revolutionary ideology safar al-hawali sahaabah sajid kaym sajid kayum salafi manhaj saleem begg salih aal ash-shaykh salih al-luhaydan salman al-aqdah salman al-awdah salman awan saudi saudi arabia sayyid qutb secular law secular laws secularism shaikh rabi shanqeetee shanqiti shaykh abd al-aziz aal ash-shaykh shaykh abd al-aziz bin baz shaykh abdul-aziz bin baz shaykh al-albani shaykh al-luhaydaan shaykh al-uthaymin shaykh ibn jibrin shaykh ibn uthaymin shaykh muhammad amaan al-jaamee shaykh muqbil bin haadee shaykh muqbil bin hadi shaykh rabee shaykh rabee' shaykh rabee bin haadee shaykh rabi shaykh rabi al-madkali shaykh rabi bin hadi al-madkhali shiah shi'ites shirk sifaat fi'liyyah social justice socialism soofee speech of allaah sufi sufism syria tabdeel tafweed tahkeem tahkeem al-qawaaneen tahkim al-qawanin takfeer takfir takfiris takhyeel tamyee' tashree' taswir al-fanni fil-qur'an tatars ta'weel tawhid tawhid al-haakimiyyah tawhid al-hakimiyyah tawhid al-hukm the companions ubaydullah al-mubarakfuri wahdat ul-wujood zilal

Archives
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009


© TheMadkhalis.Com. All rights reserved.
Madkhalis Madaakhilah The Madkhalis